Mitsubishi Attrage 2023 1.2 GLX HL vs Toyota Yaris Sedan 2023 1.3L Y (CVT) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Driving comfort and steering
- High reliability
Negative
- Limited storage space
- The performance of the sound insulation system is average
- Engine power is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 54980
SAR 64929
SAR 52900
SAR 62445
SAR 740
SAR 874
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.27
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.27
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 78.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 78.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 338.25
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 338.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4115.38
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4115.38
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
175
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245
4425
1670
1740
1515
1480
2550
2500
450
/
Fuel Economy
20.0
19.6
42
42
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.2 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
76 BHP
84 BHP - 107 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
97 BHP
100
122
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
