Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 86633
SAR 88183
SAR 83362
SAR 84812
SAR 1166
SAR 1187
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 344.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 459.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
11.5
/
Engine / Motor
180
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4.574
1760
1.876
1590
1.685
2620
2.720
432
463
Fuel Economy
15.4
12.2
41
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
231 BHP
149
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
