Pegas 1.4L M/T vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 50522
SAR 217026
SAR 48609
SAR 208826
SAR 680
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 21.07
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 147.46
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 474.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 653.02
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7688.73
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
210
4
6
1368 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4300 mm
5040
1700 mm
1905
1460 mm
1479
2570 mm
3052
475 L
455
150 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13
9.3
43 L
70
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.4 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
95 BHP
300 BHP
133 Nm
358
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
