Qin Plus FWD vs Nissan Sentra 2018 1.6L SV Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High fuel economy;
- Family-friendly comfort and space
- Comprehensive safety equipment and reliable technology
Negative
- Normal motor power performance
- Noise insulation needs to be improved
- The quality of interior materials is only acceptable
Price Comparison
SAR 94500
SAR 98220
SAR 90900
SAR 94500
SAR 1272
SAR 1322
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.88
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 41.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 176.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2146.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
180
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
✓
4
/
4765
4.615
1837
1.760
1495
1.495
2720
2.700
500
510
Fuel Economy
26
16.4
48
52
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Hybrid
Petrol
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
113 BHP
325
154
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
