Raize Limited vs T01 Adventurer Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 76663
SAR 127048
SAR 73715
SAR 122237
SAR 1032
SAR 1710
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.35
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 51.45
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 227.85
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 501.27
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2682.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
17"
4030
4705
1710
1895
1635
1936
/
2150
/
2860
/
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
20.6
9.1
36
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3-inch
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R17
/
205/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.0
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
✓
/
97
248 BHP
140
410
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)