RX5 1.5T LUX vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 98741
SAR 142496
SAR 95002
SAR 137080
SAR 1329
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
/
4
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
19
/
4571 mm
4722
1855 mm
1860
1719 mm
1705
2708 mm
2710
430 L
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
14.9
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
254 BHP
275 Nm
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
