RX5 1.5T STD vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 88118
SAR 95620
SAR 84790
SAR 92000
SAR 1186
SAR 1287
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 26.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 187.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 831.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9785.65
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5
18
/
4571 mm
4400 mm
1855 mm
1830 mm
1719 mm
1590 mm
2708 mm
2630 mm
430 L
/
145
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
7.1
55 L
51 L
14.7 Km/L
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
194 BHP
275 Nm
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
