RX5 1.5T STD vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 88118
SAR 88183
SAR 84790
SAR 84812
SAR 1186
SAR 1187
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 474.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
9.4
/
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
210
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4571 mm
4.574
1855 mm
1.876
1719 mm
1.685
2708 mm
2.720
430 L
463
145
/
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
12.2
55 L
55
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
171 BHP
231 BHP
275 Nm
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
