T2 Luxury Plus 2026 vs Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 152825
SAR 140937
SAR 147024
SAR 135585
SAR 2057
SAR 1897
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
200
4
/
/
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1880
/
20
/
5 Doors
/
4612
4550
2006
1820
1880
1680
2800
2620
/
1053
220 mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
11.0
/
58
/
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Rear Electronic Limited Slip Differential
/
8AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Real time 4WD
/
Limited-Slip Differential
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
255/55R20
/
255/55R20
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
/
/
/
250
188 BHP
/
222
Technologies
✓
✓
Sports, Economy, Standard, Snow, Sediment, Rock, X Smart Mode
/
Auto
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
