Tank 300 2023 2.0T Challenger vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 142127
SAR 145400
SAR 136735
SAR 139900
SAR 1913
SAR 1957
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4760
4455 mm
1930
2050 mm
1903
1615 mm
2750
2720 mm
/
215/55R18
/
5 Doors
/
440 L
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
12.2
/
80
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
RCW
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
217 BHP
201 BHP
387
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
