Geely Coolray 2025 1.5 MID Option vs 500 Signature 3.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 24.9
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 174.27
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 771.75
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9086.68
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
7.6
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
6
/
2899 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
4380
4886 mm
1800
1934 mm
1609
1905 mm
2600
2850 mm
/
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
545 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
8 Km/L
/
80 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
14.6
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
172 BHP
348 BHP
290
500 Nm
/
V
/
3.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)