ZS 1.5L STD vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 57134
SAR 56980
SAR 54970
SAR 54797
SAR 769
SAR 767
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
170
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
✓
5
/
4323
4.314
1809
1.809
1653
1.624
2585
2.585
359/1166
448
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
17.2
45
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
112 BHP
88
/
180
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
