ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 74665
SAR 95620
SAR 71823
SAR 92000
SAR 1005
SAR 1287
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 26.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 187.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 831.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9785.65
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180 km/h
/
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
18
/
5
5
4430
4400 mm
1818
1830 mm
1635
1590 mm
2610
2630 mm
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
7.1
45
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
194 BHP
88
/
180
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
