ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 74665
SAR 77778
SAR 71823
SAR 74790
SAR 1005
SAR 1047
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
18
/
5
/
4430
4.351
1818
1.831
1635
1.662
2610
/
359/1166
340
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
/
45
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
168
113 BHP
88
/
180
143
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
