2008 GT vs X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 105940
SAR 108920
SAR 101898
SAR 104800
SAR 1426
SAR 1466
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
/
3
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
17
17
4300
4680
1987
2065
1550
1730
/
2705
545
/
/
4
/
212
Fuel Economy
16.8
16.1
44
55
Comfort
✓
/
/
/
❌
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
10
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
AT
CVT
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
✓
/
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
130
181 BHP
230
244
/
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 @ 6,000
/
244 @ 4,000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
