Eado Plus Trend vs Suzuki Baleno 2024 1.5L GLX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- A budget-friendly price
- Stylish exterior design
Negative
- Power performance on highways is limited
- The quality of interior materials is modest
- Sound insulation can be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 63660
SAR 67535
SAR 61200
SAR 64975
SAR 857
SAR 909
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.04 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.66
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 53.62
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 237.46
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2795.9
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1494 mL
/
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4770
3990
1840
1745
1440
1500
2765
2520
/
355
Fuel Economy
18.4
22.7
51
37
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
Segment TFT 10.25 Inches
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2 Inches
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DCT
/
7
/
7-DCT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson Independent
/
Twist-beam Non-independent
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/50 R17
/
215/50 R17
/
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4
/
DOHC
/
178 BHP
103 BHP
300
138
Motor
181
/
Transverse
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Eco - Normal - Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
