GLC Coupe 200 4Matic vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.5T VX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 383145
SAR 383527
SAR 368624
SAR 369035
SAR 5157
SAR 5162
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 20.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 141.12
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.88
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 564.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 443.52
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7358.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5781.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4656
5115
1890
1980
1639
1945
2873
/
550
/
Fuel Economy
7.1
9.3
66
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
211 BHP
409 BHP
350
650
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
