GT 1.5T LUX vs Mazda 6 Entry Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
SAR 83946
SAR 87290
SAR 80730
SAR 83950
SAR 1130
SAR 1175
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
221
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1539
/
19
17
4 Doors
4
4571
4865
1855
1840
1719
1450
2708
/
430
429
145
/
Fuel Economy
16.9 Km/L
/
55
/
16.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
8
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
/
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171
190 BHP
275
252
/
91
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
