HR-V LX vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Flexible interior design and practical space
- Fuel efficiency and economical maintenance
- Driving comfort and good wheelbase adjustment
Negative
- Insufficient engine performance in some cases
- The quality of interior materials needs to be improved
- Standard equipment is limited in basic categories
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 135732
SAR 142496
SAR 130560
SAR 137080
SAR 1827
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 312.48
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
1498cc
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
4722
1790
1860
1590
1705
2610
2710
196
/
Fuel Economy
40
/
/
14.9
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
Front
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
4
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
254 BHP
87.7
/
6600
/
145
390
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
