Jaguar F-Pace 2024 2.0T S (250 PS) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.5T GXR-L3 (4WD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 310637
SAR 311458
SAR 298885
SAR 299690
SAR 4181
SAR 4192
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.88
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 312.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 491.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5781.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
217
/
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4746
5115
2070
1980
1664
1945
2874
/
650
/
Fuel Economy
13.5
9.3
63
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
246 BHP
409 BHP
365
650
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
