MG ZS 2023 1.3T LUX vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 85219
SAR 88183
SAR 81995
SAR 84812
SAR 1147
SAR 1187
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 107.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 474.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5591.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
8.0
/
Engine / Motor
185
210
3
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4314
4.574
1809
1.876
1624
1.685
2585
2.720
448
463
Fuel Economy
17.2
12.2
48
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
160 BHP
231 BHP
230
360
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
