MG ZS 2023 1.3T LUX vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 85219
SAR 88118
SAR 81995
SAR 84790
SAR 1147
SAR 1186
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
190 km/h
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4314
4571 mm
1809
1855 mm
1624
1719 mm
2585
2708 mm
448
430 L
/
18
/
145
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.7 Km/L
48
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.3 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
160 BHP
171 BHP
230
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
