Porsche Macan 2024 S vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.5T VXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Exceptional driving experience with high precision
- Luxurious interior design with high-quality materials
- The attractiveness of the Porsche brand
Negative
- Limited interior space for seats and trunk
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Low suitability for everyday practical use
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 421047
SAR 423715
SAR 405135
SAR 407675
SAR 5667
SAR 5703
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 349.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
254
/
6
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4696
5145
1923
1980
1624
1890
2807
/
488
/
Fuel Economy
11.2
10.1
65
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
354 BHP
409 BHP
480
650
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓