Seal Performance vs 3.5 Gasoline Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and luxurious interior design
- Optimal performance and economical fuel consumption
- Security system and advanced technologies
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Slightly limited rear legroom
- Difficulty in the availability of some custom options
Price Comparison
SAR 190720
SAR 190860
SAR 183498
SAR 183600
SAR 2567
SAR 2569
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Chinese
/
/
3,470
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
2185
/
4 Doors
/
4800 mm
5050
1875 mm
1880
1460 mm
1480
2920 mm
2895
400 L
/
145 mm
/
/
1624
/
1631
Fuel Economy
/
13.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Double wishbone suspension
MacPherson Strut
Multi- link（5 links）
MacPherson Strut
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
523 BHP
296
390
6,400
670 Nm
36.6
/
3.5
/
5,000
Motor
9
/
Blade Battery (LFP)
/
150 kW
/
Technologies
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
