Tucson Comfort 1.6L vs Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 93393
SAR 93385
SAR 89865
SAR 89824
SAR 1257
SAR 1257
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.23
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 92.61
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 396.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4828.95
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
/
✓
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
192
4
4
1596 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4500 mm
4.395
1865 mm
1.795
1650 mm
1.562
2680 mm
2.655
620 L
430
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
16.7
54 L
48
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
Single Turbo
/
4
/
177 BHP
155 BHP
264 Nm
200
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
