Urban Cruiser GL vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
SAR 95620
SAR 82915
SAR 92000
SAR 1160
SAR 1287
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 26.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 187.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 831.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9785.65
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
180 km/h
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
/
4365
4400 mm
1795
1830 mm
1645
1590 mm
2600
2630 mm
210
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
19.8
7.1
45 L
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.25
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
194 BHP
135
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
