Urban Cruiser GL vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 86183
SAR 88118
SAR 82915
SAR 84790
SAR 1160
SAR 1186
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.35
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 51.45
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 220.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2682.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
18
4365
4571 mm
1795
1855 mm
1645
1719 mm
2600
2708 mm
210
145
/
430 L
Fuel Economy
19.8
14.7 Km/L
45 L
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
2
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
14.1
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
225/50 R18
215/60 R17
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
171 BHP
135
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
