Urban Cruiser GL X vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 95763
SAR 142496
SAR 92115
SAR 137080
SAR 1289
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 302.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
17
/
4365
4722
1795
1860
1645
1705
2600
2710
210
/
Fuel Economy
19.8
14.9
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101
254 BHP
135
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
