Veloz GX vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical in fuel consumption
- High reliability and stable performance
Negative
- Limited engine capacity for high power
- Relatively old entertainment technologies
- Interior materials are less luxurious than some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 85955
SAR 142496
SAR 82671
SAR 137080
SAR 1157
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.96
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 90.72
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 388.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 302.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4730.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4475 mm
4722
1750 mm
1860
1700 mm
1705
2890 mm
2710
350 L
/
205 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
14.9
43 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Vinyl Upholstery
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
105 BHP
254 BHP
138 Nm
390
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
