Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 220139
SAR 149327
SAR 211794
SAR 143635
SAR 2963
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 26.81
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 19.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 187.67
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 134.05
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 831.11
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 593.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 9785.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6989.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
3600 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
4760 mm
1877 mm
1930 mm
1801 mm
1927 mm
3007 mm
2750 mm
487 L
400 L
246 m
224 m
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
10 Km/L
87 L
75 L
7 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
285 BHP
224 BHP
352 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)