ZR-V EX vs HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship (Two Tone) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Comfortable and practical interior design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced security technologies and systems
Negative
- Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
- Pricing may be higher than competitors
- Modest engine performance compared to some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 135732
SAR 140200
SAR 130560
SAR 134900
SAR 1827
SAR 1887
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
220 km/h
/
1990 cc
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1488
/
18 英寸
/
4567
4655 mm
1840
1900 mm
1621
1668 mm
2657
2770 mm
380
/
186
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
17
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sports
Safety
√
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
12.6
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
12
10
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
麦弗逊式独立悬挂
/
多连杆式独立悬挂
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/55 R18
/
225/55 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
Direct Injection+Turbo Charging
有
Single Turbo
4
4
180
248 BHP
132.4
/
6000
/
240
380 Nm
1700-4500
/
直喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
