ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 74665
SAR 142496
SAR 71823
SAR 137080
SAR 1005
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.41
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 93.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 415.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4892.83
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
18
/
5
/
4430
4722
1818
1860
1635
1705
2610
2710
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
14.9
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
254 BHP
88
/
180
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
