Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 147625
SAR 147625
SAR 142025
SAR 142025
SAR 1987
SAR 1987
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.12
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.12
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 214.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 214.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2613.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2613.4
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
3
/
2355
/
16
/
5915
/
1950
/
2280
/
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1145
/
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
/
Diesel
/
174
/
420
/
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
