Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Ford Transit 2023 2.2L Custom 330L M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 147625
SAR 149625
SAR 142025
SAR 143923
SAR 1987
SAR 2014
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2120.65
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2355
/
16
/
5915
4972
1950
2272
2280
2020
3860
2933
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1145
/
/
6000
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
14.3
70
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
2.2 L
Diesel
Diesel
174
125 BHP
420
350
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
