Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 121694
SAR 120879
SAR 117070
SAR 116291
SAR 1638
SAR 1627
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 20.58
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 144.06
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 485.1
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 617.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7511.7
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
65 L
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
5915 mm
1950
1950 mm
1990
2280 mm
3210
3860 mm
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
options.9,800 L
/
800 L
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
7.4 Km/L
70
65 L
/
7.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
277
277 BHP
351
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Motor
/
360 Nm
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
