Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Toyota Hiace 2024 2.8L Van M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 121694
SAR 122741
SAR 117070
SAR 118105
SAR 1638
SAR 1652
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
160
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
5265
1950
1950
1990
1990
3210
3210
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
6200
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
13.3
70
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.8 L
Gasoline
Diesel
277
174 BHP
351
420
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
