Cerato 1.6L LX vs Mazda 6 Entry Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
SAR 84398
SAR 87290
SAR 81188
SAR 83950
SAR 1136
SAR 1175
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
221
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4865
1800
1840
1440
1450
2700
/
427
429
/
17
/
4
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
53
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
/
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
190 BHP
154
252
/
91
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
