300 Challenger 2.0T vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Price Comparison
SAR 149327
TBD
SAR 143635
TBD
SAR 2010
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 349.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
240 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3492 cc
Chinese
Japanese
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
5350 mm
1930 mm
2030 mm
1927 mm
1955 mm
2750 mm
3075 mm
400 L
836 L
224 m
253 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
75 L
97 L
10 Km/L
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
14.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
425 BHP
387 Nm
700 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
