300 Conqueror vs Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 164857
SAR 162406
SAR 158585
SAR 156228
SAR 2219
SAR 2186
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.02 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.52
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 2.88
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 20.16
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 345.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 86.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4204.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1051.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760
4695 mm
1930
1800 mm
1927
1710 mm
2750
2670 mm
400 L
463 L
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
62.5 Km/L
75 L
43 L
10 Km/L
62.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
236 BHP
387 Nm
300 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
