300 Conqueror vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Price Comparison
SAR 164857
TBD
SAR 158585
TBD
SAR 2219
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
240 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3492 cc
Chinese
Japanese
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760
5350 mm
1930
2030 mm
1927
1955 mm
2750
3075 mm
400 L
836 L
224
253 m
Fuel Economy
12.1
/
75 L
97 L
10 Km/L
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
14.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
425 BHP
387 Nm
700 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
