ALTIMA SR vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 123180
SAR 72068
SAR 118500
SAR 69339
SAR 1658
SAR 970
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1440
/
19
/
4
4 Doors
4900
4553 mm
1852
1748 mm
2825
2650 mm
/
1476 mm
Fuel Economy
16.4
13 Km/L
61
40 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
5
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Sport Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Dual Front Airbags Seat-mounted side-impact supplemental air bags for front- and rear-seat outboard occupants Roof-mounted curtain side-impact supplemental air bags with rollover sensor for front-and rear-seat outboard occupant head protection
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
188 BHP
119 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
145 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
