CarteaCompare CarsAttrage 1.2 GLS vs Skoda Octavia 2023 Active 1.6

Attrage 1.2 GLS vs Skoda Octavia 2023 Active 1.6 Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low maintenance cost
  • Easy maneuverability in the city

Negative

  • Engine performance is modest
  • Limited internal quality
  • Insufficient noise insulation

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

SAR 39217

TBD

SAR 37682

TBD

SAR 528

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.05 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 7.2

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 10.08

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 50.4

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 70.56

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 201.6

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 282.24

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 2628

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3679.2

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

12.0

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

190

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4245 mm

4670

1670 mm

1814

1515 mm

1461

2550 mm

2686

450 L

568

Fuel Economy

20 Km/L

14.9

42 L

50

20 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

MacPherson strut with stabilizer

/

Torsion beam

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Disc (ventilated)

/

Drum (leading & trailing)

/

185/55R15

/

185/55R15

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.2 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

76 BHP

110 BHP

100 Nm

155

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Attrage 1.2 GLS

VS

Changan | Changan Alsvin 2021 1.5L Basic

Mitsubishi | Attrage 1.2 GLS

VS

Changan | Changan Alsvin 2021 1.5L Advanced

Mitsubishi | Attrage 1.2 GLS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Avalon 2017 3.5L XLE

Mitsubishi | Attrage 1.2 GLS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Avalon 2015 3.5L SE plus

Mitsubishi | Attrage 1.2 GLS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Avalon 2015 3.5L SE

Mitsubishi Related Car

Škoda Related Car