CarteaCompare CarsBJ40 2.0T vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

BJ40 2.0T vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Outstanding off-road performance
  • Outstanding engine power
  • Spacious and luxurious interior design

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Slow electronic system response

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.1 L/KM

0 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 11.65

Daily Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 81.55

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 361.15

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 4252.25

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

240 km/h

4

6

1981 cc

3492 cc

Chinese

Japanese

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4645 mm

5350 mm

1925 mm

2030 mm

1871 mm

1955 mm

2745 mm

3075 mm

532 L

836 L

220 m

253 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

75 L

97 L

10 Km/L

7.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

Keyless Entry

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Electric

Electric

/

Standard

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

10.25

14.3

Standard LCD

Android LCD

6

12

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

Halogen

LED

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Twin Turbo

4

4

218 BHP

425 BHP

320 Nm

700 Nm

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | BJ40 2.0T

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2016 SE

BAIC | BJ40 2.0T

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2015 LE

BAIC | BJ40 2.0T

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2016 PE

BAIC | BJ40 2.0T

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2015 PE

BAIC | BJ40 2.0T

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2016 LE

BAIC Related Car

Nissan Related Car

BAIC Related New Car

Nissan Related New Car