C3 Aircross FEEL vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 86100
SAR 149327
SAR 82800
SAR 143635
SAR 1159
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
16.6
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
1.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
