Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs T1 Lux Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Price Comparison
SAR 116053
TBD
SAR 111665
TBD
SAR 1562
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 432
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4706
1930
1967
1790
1845
2810
2810
/
5
/
1690
/
1700
Fuel Economy
10.5
20
74
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
251 BHP
360
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
