Chevrolet Tahoe 2024 5.3L Premium 4WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 149327
TBD
SAR 143635
TBD
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.13 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 469.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
200 km/h
8
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
9 Seater
5 Seater
5351
4760 mm
2057
1930 mm
1927
1927 mm
3070
2750 mm
1461
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
7.7
10 Km/L
100
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Lighting configuration
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
5.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
355 BHP
224 BHP
519
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
