Chevrolet Tahoe 2024 LT 2WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 149327
TBD
SAR 143635
TBD
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 433.38
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
172
200 km/h
8
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
9 Seater
5 Seater
5181
4760 mm
2044
1930 mm
1890
1927 mm
2946
2750 mm
1461
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
8.1
10 Km/L
100
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
5.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
355 BHP
224 BHP
383
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
