Coolray 2025 GF vs Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 94797
SAR 179644
SAR 91184
SAR 172820
SAR 1276
SAR 2418
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
208
4
4
1497 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4191
1810 mm
1794
1615 mm
1508
2600 mm
2601
330 L
405
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
18.5
45 L
50
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
2
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172
150 BHP
290 Nm
250
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
