Coolray 2025 GL vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 80601
TBD
SAR 77501
TBD
SAR 1085
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 454.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
/
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4385
1810 mm
1875
1615 mm
1850
2600 mm
2560
330 L
500
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
7.7
45 L
69
16 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
184 BHP
290 Nm
303
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
