CR-V TOURING vs GLC Coupe 200 4Matic Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 188712
SAR 383145
SAR 181560
SAR 368624
SAR 2540
SAR 5157
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 505.61
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
1498cc
/
Dimensions
7
5
1783
/
18 英寸
/
/
/
4706
4656
1866
1890
1681
1639
2700
2873
150
550
198
/
Fuel Economy
57
66
/
7.1
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Interior
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
235/60R18
/
235/60R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
/
√
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
4
/
10.3:1
/
DOHC DUAL VTC + Exhaust-VTEC
/
190
211 BHP
140.7
/
6000
/
243
350
1700-5000
/
VTEC
/
直喷
/
Euro 5
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
